標(biāo)題: Do you think so? [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: monica 時(shí)間: 2010-6-30 18:07 標(biāo)題: Do you think so? YOU CANNOT ASSUME THAT AN Organic Trace Minerals
WILL BE MORE BIOAVAILABLE THAN INORGANICA ONE.
Do you think so? What is your opinion?作者: monica 時(shí)間: 2010-6-30 18:09
Sure作者: bonderic 時(shí)間: 2010-7-1 08:22
前一段時(shí)間問過美國(guó)谷物協(xié)會(huì)的閻老師，他說美國(guó)使用無機(jī)微量元素的豬場(chǎng)還有很多。作者: qiaoyongniu 時(shí)間: 2010-7-1 10:12
i think Organic Trace Minerals will be the trend, because the high efficiency, becuase the environment pollution, because the animal healthy and food safety!作者: monica 時(shí)間: 2010-7-2 11:25
Guo (2001b) found 127.7 and 99.3 for Cu-amino acid and a copper proteinate relative to copper sulfate
Baker and Halpin (1987) Mn-Proteinate not significantly different from MnSO4
Miles (2003) Mn amino acid chelate 84% relative to MnSO4作者: 海潤(rùn)德 時(shí)間: 2010-7-4 19:36
初來乍到，看不懂，慚愧，還需多學(xué)習(xí)作者: pusu19811225 時(shí)間: 2010-7-9 10:10
from econology view, we'd better use organic trace minerials; while from economic point, it's not a must to use organic ones. so paradox exists always.
my suggestion is feed specialist in farms or feed mills try their best to use organic ones as long as the profit can support it, for a better earth, for a better life, for our own generation, for our children's generation.作者: 夏明亮 時(shí)間: 2010-7-9 10:32
看著一句句中式英語(yǔ)，我很欣慰啊，呵呵作者: hainavy 時(shí)間: 2010-7-11 12:54
i think it is not usable because the high cost.